Discussion:
[CMake] add_library ALIAS
rmawatson rmawatson
2018-11-19 14:20:08 UTC
Permalink
I am trying to figure out exactly what this line is for in the cmake file of the github json project here -> https://github.com/nlohmann/json/blob/develop/CMakeLists.txt#L48

add_library(${PROJECT_NAME}::${NLOHMANN_JSON_TARGET_NAME} ALIAS ${NLOHMANN_JSON_TARGET_NAME})

Specifically with this example, what does this allow in this cmake file that otherwise would not be possible?

The commit message where this line was added says,

"Enable target namespaces and build dir project config

CMake convention is to use a project namespace, i.e. Foo::, for imported
targets. When multiple targets are imported from a project, this looks
like Foo::Bar1 Foo::Bar2, etc. This adds the nlohmann_json:: namespace to
the exported target names.

This also allows the generated project config files to be used from the
build directory instead of just the install directory."
Removing this line appears to make no difference to any off the generated cmake files. I can still use find_package with the build directory in CMAKE_PREFIX-PATH with our without this line. Has something changed in cmake since this was added?
I am using cmake 3.10.2.
Thanks.
Craig Scott
2018-11-19 20:51:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by rmawatson rmawatson
I am trying to figure out exactly what this line is for in the cmake file
of the github json project here ->
https://github.com/nlohmann/json/blob/develop/CMakeLists.txt#L48
add_library(${PROJECT_NAME}::${NLOHMANN_JSON_TARGET_NAME} ALIAS
${NLOHMANN_JSON_TARGET_NAME})
Specifically with this example, what does this allow in this cmake file
that otherwise would not be possible?
It is to make incorporating the project into a larger project via
add_subdirectory() rather than via find_package() more
convenient/consistent. The latter relies on an installed package, which
will have been exported with the nlohmann_json:: namespace, so it will
provide imported targets with names like nlohmann_json::nlohmann_json. When
incorporating the project via add_subdirectory() instead, nothing is
exported, so targets like nlohmann_json::nlohmann_json won't exist unless
they are explicitly added as an ALIAS like in the example above.

In other words, ALIAS targets like this allow consuming projects to use the
same target name (nlohmann_json::nlohmann_json) regardless of how they
bring the json project in as a dependency.
Post by rmawatson rmawatson
The commit message where this line was added says,
"Enable target namespaces and build dir project config
CMake convention is to use a project namespace, i.e. Foo::, for imported
targets. When multiple targets are imported from a project, this looks
like Foo::Bar1 Foo::Bar2, etc. This adds the nlohmann_json:: namespace to
the exported target names.
This also allows the generated project config files to be used from the
build directory instead of just the install directory."
Removing this line appears to make no difference to any off the generated
cmake files. I can still use find_package with the build directory in
CMAKE_PREFIX-PATH with our without this line. Has something changed in
cmake since this was added?
The ALIAS won't change the exported files (because it isn't itself
installed/exported), it is only for use directly by a parent project
consuming it via add_subdirectory(). This is not a new feature, but it has
perhaps been discussed more openly in the past year or two. When the
FetchContent <https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/module/FetchContent.html>
module was added in CMake 3.11, it also became much easier to incorporate a
dependency via add_subdirectory().
--
Craig Scott
Melbourne, Australia
https://crascit.com

New book released: Professional CMake: A Practical Guide
<https://crascit.com/professional-cmake/>
Alan W. Irwin
2018-11-20 01:18:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by rmawatson rmawatson
I am trying to figure out exactly what this line is for in the cmake file of the github json project here -> https://github.com/nlohmann/json/blob/develop/CMakeLists.txt#L48
add_library(${PROJECT_NAME}::${NLOHMANN_JSON_TARGET_NAME} ALIAS ${NLOHMANN_JSON_TARGET_NAME})
Specifically with this example, what does this allow in this cmake file that otherwise would not be possible?
The commit message where this line was added says,
"Enable target namespaces and build dir project config
CMake convention is to use a project namespace, i.e. Foo::, for imported
targets. When multiple targets are imported from a project, this looks
like Foo::Bar1 Foo::Bar2, etc. This adds the nlohmann_json:: namespace to
the exported target names.
This also allows the generated project config files to be used from the
build directory instead of just the install directory."
Removing this line appears to make no difference to any off the generated cmake files. I can still use find_package with the build directory in CMAKE_PREFIX-PATH with our without this line. Has something changed in cmake since this was added?
I am using cmake 3.10.2.
No, ALIASed targets continue to be supported by the latest CMake because
they are an important component of CMake best practices for name-spaced
targets. Thus, unless you can prove it has no effect you should leave
that ALIAS logic alone.

For example, a common use case for ALIASed targets is to allow
build-tree CMake logic to use the same name-spaced name for a
project's build-tree targets as foreign projects use to import targets
from that project. So to take one example, the PLplot standard
examples are all linked against the target PLPLOT:plplot (our
principal library). That target name refers to an ALIASed target in
our build tree but is a simple imported namespaced target in our
installed examples tree (which is set up as a foreign project that
imports namespaced targets such as PLPLOT:plplot from the PLplot
installation). Therefore this ALIASing allows us to use and maintain
the identical CMake logic (where we literally install copies of some
of our build-tree CMakeLists.txt files in our installed examples tree)
for the two separate cases. If we removed our ALIASed targets in the
build tree, that would not affect anything in our installed examples
tree, but it sure would mess up our build-tree testing (which depends
on our examples getting built in that case), and you may find similar
build-tree test failures would occur for the project you are
investigating if you removed the ALIASing logic.

Alan
__________________________
Alan W. Irwin

Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state
implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time
Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting
software package (plplot.sf.net); the libLASi project
(unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net);
and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net).
__________________________

Linux-powered Science
__________________________
--
Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...